Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Mandelka, Leon Eric [VerfasserIn]   i
 Wolf, Justine [VerfasserIn]   i
 Medrow, Antonia [VerfasserIn]   i
 Grützner, Paul Alfred [VerfasserIn]   i
 Vetter, Sven Y. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Gierse, Jula [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Comparison of different imaging devices and navigation systems for cervical pedicle screw placement
Titelzusatz:an experimental study on screw accuracy, screw placement time and radiation dose
Verf.angabe:Eric Mandelka, Justine Wolf, Antonia Medrow, Paul A. Gruetzner, Sven Y. Vetter & Jula Gierse
E-Jahr:2024
Jahr:12 November 2024
Umfang:10 S.
Illustrationen:Illustrationen
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 13.05.2025
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Scientific reports
Ort Quelle:[London] : Springer Nature, 2011
Jahr Quelle:2024
Band/Heft Quelle:14(2024), Artikel-ID 27759, Seite 1-10
ISSN Quelle:2045-2322
Abstract:Cervical pedicle screws (CPS) provide biomechanically superior fixation compared to other techniques but are technically more demanding. Navigated CPS placement has been increasingly reported as a safe and accurate technique, yet there are few studies comparing different combinations of imaging and navigation systems under comparable conditions. With this study, we aimed to compare different imaging and navigation systems for CPS placement in terms of accuracy, screw placement time and applied radiation dose. For this experimental study, navigated CPS placement was performed at levels C2 to C7 in 24 identical radiopaque artificial spine models by two surgeons with different levels of experience using three different combinations of intraoperative 3D imaging devices and navigation systems. Accuracy, time and radiation dose were compared between the groups. In total, 288 screws were placed. Accuracy was > 98% in all groups with no significant differences between groups or between surgeons (P = 0.30 and P = 0.31, respectively), but the inexperienced surgeon required significantly more time (P < 0.001). Radiation dose was significantly higher with iCT compared to CBCT (P < 0.0001). Under experimental conditions, accuracy rates of > 98% were achieved for navigated CPS placement regardless of the imaging modality or navigation system used. Radiation doses were significantly lower for CBCT compared to iCT guidance.
DOI:doi:10.1038/s41598-024-77191-2
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

kostenfrei: Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77191-2
 kostenfrei: Volltext: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-77191-2
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77191-2
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Bone
 Bone imaging
 Experimental models of disease
 Fracture repair
 Three-dimensional imaging
 Trauma
K10plus-PPN:1925470385
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69344182   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang