Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Ammann, Yanic Rolf [VerfasserIn]   i
 Klein, Marie [VerfasserIn]   i
 Marti, Lukas [VerfasserIn]   i
 Warschkow, Rene [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ströse, Lennard [VerfasserIn]   i
 Sparn, Moritz [VerfasserIn]   i
 Jäger, Tarkan [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bischofberger, Stephan [VerfasserIn]   i
 Brunner, Walter [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Does transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) result in better quality of life and functional outcomes than traditional TME does?
Titelzusatz:a retrospective propensity score-adjusted cohort study : research
Verf.angabe:Yanic Ammann, Marie Klein, Lukas Marti, Rene Warschkow, Lennard Ströse, Moritz Sparn, Tarkan Jäger, Stephan Bischofberger, Walter Brunner
E-Jahr:2025
Jahr:December 2025
Umfang:12 S.
Fussnoten:Online veröffentlicht: 30. April 2025 ; Gesehen am 27.05.2025
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Langenbeck's archives of surgery
Ort Quelle:Berlin : Springer, 1998
Jahr Quelle:2025
Band/Heft Quelle:410(2025), 1 vom: Dez., Artikel-ID 149, Seite 1-12
ISSN Quelle:1435-2451
Abstract:Purpose The improved prognosis of rectal cancer through modern therapeutic approaches raises questions regarding quality of life (QoL) and functional outcomes. In this study, we compared post-transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) short- and long-term QoL and functional outcomes with those after abdominal TME (abTME). Methods Prospective data from patients who underwent elective taTME or abTME for stage I-III rectal cancer followed by anastomosis were retrospectively propensity score-adjusted. The primary endpoint, QoL, was assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Functional outcomes were the secondary endpoints. Results Among 494 patients during 2013-2022, 187 patients who underwent taTME and 62 patients who underwent abTME were included. QoL was worse after taTME at isolated time points: overall QoL (after 3 years: 72 vs. 82 points, p = 0.017) and QLQ-total (after 3 years: 81 vs. 87 points, p = 0.028; after 4 years: 82 vs. 89 points, p = 0.012). After propensity score matching, the between-group differences were still significant but smaller: overall QoL − 6 points, p = 0.021; QLQ-total − 5 points, p = 0.026. Conclusion The differences reported at isolated time points have questionable clinical relevance. Therefore, taTME and traditional abTME seem to have comparable long-term QoL and functional outcomes. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06505863, https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?id=NCT06505863 .
DOI:doi:10.1007/s00423-025-03724-6
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

kostenfrei: Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03724-6
 kostenfrei: Volltext: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00423-025-03724-6
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03724-6
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
K10plus-PPN:1926692241
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69348422   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang