Eversion carotid endarterectomy is associated with decreased baroreceptor sensitivity compared to the conventional technique

• Verfasst von: Demirel, Serdar [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Macek, Laura [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Hakimi, Maani [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Böckler, Dittmar [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Attigah, Nicolas [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Eversion carotid endarterectomy is associated with decreased baroreceptor sensitivity compared to the conventional technique
• Verf.angabe: S. Demirel, L. Macek, H. Bruijnen, M. Hakimi, D. Böckler, N. Attigah
• Umfang: 9 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 26.02.2019
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery
• Jahr Quelle: 2012
• Band/Heft Quelle: 44(2012), 1, S. 1-8
• ISSN Quelle: 1532-2165
• DOI: doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.04.009
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• K10plus-PPN: 1588120392

Abstract

Objective: Impairment of baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) has been shown to be associated with blood pressure instability after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in postoperative BRS changes following eversion CEA (E-CEA) and conventional CEA (C-CEA). Methods: Sixty-four patients undergoing E-CEA (n ¼ 37) and C-CEA (n ¼ 27) were prospectively studied. Non-invasive measurements of mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO) and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were perioperatively obtained over three 10-min periods. Baroreflex gain was calculated as the sequential cross-correlation between heart rate and beat-to-beat systolic blood pressure. Results: Compared with changes observed after C-CEA, E-CEA was associated with an increase in systolic pressure (SP) (P ¼ 0.01), diastolic pressure (DP) (P ¼ 0.008), MAP (P ¼ 0.002) and heart rate (HR) (P ¼ 0.03) on postoperative day 1 (POD-1). BRS decreased afterE-CEA from 6.33 to 4.71 ms mmHgÀ1 on POD-1 (P ¼ 0.001) and to 5.26 ms mmHgÀ1 on POD-3 (P ¼ 0.0004). By contrast, BRS increased after CCEA from 4.59 to 6.13 ms mmHgÀ1 on POD-1 (P ¼ 0.002) and to 6.27 ms mmHgÀ1 on POD-3 (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: E-CEA and C-CEA have different effects on BRS. This is associated with an altered haemodynamic behaviour after E-CEA and C-CEA, respectively. These findings are likely the result of carotid sinus nerve interruption during E-CEA and preservation with C-CEA.