Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Baessler, Franziska [VerfasserIn]   i
 Zafar, Ali [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ciprianidis, Anja [VerfasserIn]   i
 Wagner, Fabienne L. [VerfasserIn]   i
 Klein, Sonja Bettina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schweizer-Schubert, Sophie [VerfasserIn]   i
 Bartolovic, Marina [VerfasserIn]   i
 Roesch-Ely, Daniela [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ditzen, Beate [VerfasserIn]   i
 Nikendei, Christoph [VerfasserIn]   i
 Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Analysis of risk communication teaching in psychosocial and other medical departments
Verf.angabe:Franziska Baessler, Ali Zafar, Anja Ciprianidis, Fabienne Louise Wagner, Sonja Bettina Klein, Sophie Schweizer, Marina Bartolovic, Daniela Roesch-Ely, Beate Ditzen, Christoph Nikendei and Jobst-Hendrik Schultz
E-Jahr:2020
Jahr:04 Apr 2020
Umfang:11 S.
Illustrationen:Diagramme
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 17.04.2020
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: Medical education online
Ort Quelle:East Lansing, Mich. : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1996
Jahr Quelle:2020
Band/Heft Quelle:25(2020,1) Artikel-Nummer 1746014, Seite 1-11
ISSN Quelle:1087-2981
Abstract:Aims: Teaching students about risk communication is an important aspect at medical schools given the growing importance of informed consent in healthcare. This observational study analyzes the quality of teaching content on risk communication and biostatistics at a medical school.Methods: Based on the concept of curriculum mapping, purpose-designed questionnaires were used via participant observers to record the frequency, characteristics and context of risk communication employed by lecturers during teaching sessions for one semester. The data was analyzed quantitatively and descriptively.Results: Teaching about risk communication was observed in 24.4% (n = 95 of 390) sessions. Prevalence varied significantly among different departments with dermatology having the highest rate (67.9%) but lesser in-depth teaching than medical psychology where risk communication concepts were discussed on a higher scale in 61.4% sessions. Relevant statistical values were not mentioned at all in 69% of these 95 sessions and clinical contexts were used rarely (55.8%). Supplementary teaching material was provided in 50.5% sessions while students asked questions in 18.9% sessions.Conclusions: Students are infrequently taught about communicating risks. When they are, the teaching does not include the mention of core biostatistics values nor does the teaching involve methods for demonstrating risk communication.
DOI:doi:10.1080/10872981.2020.1746014
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1746014
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1746014
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:biostatistics
 communication skills
 informed consent
 medical curriculum
 medical education
 Risk communication
K10plus-PPN:1694845311
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68565791   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang