CT volumetry of artificial pulmonary nodules using an ex vivo lung phantom

• Verfasst von: Wielpütz, Mark Oliver [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Lederlin, Mathieu [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Wroblewski, Jacek [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Dinkel, Julien [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Eichinger, Monika [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Biederer, Jürgen [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Puderbach, Michael [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: CT volumetry of artificial pulmonary nodules using an ex vivo lung phantom
• Titelzusatz: influence of exposure parameters and iterative reconstruction on reproducibility
• Verf.angabe: Mark O. Wielpütz, Mathieu Lederlin, Jacek Wroblewski, Julien Dinkel, Monika Eichinger, Jürgen Biederer, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Michael Puderbach
• E-Jahr: 2013
• Jahr: 31 May 2013
• Umfang: 7 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 08.11.2021
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: European journal of radiology
• Ort Quelle: Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1990
• Jahr Quelle: 2013
• Band/Heft Quelle: 82(2013), 9, Seite 1577-1583
• ISSN Quelle: 1872-7727
• DOI: doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.035
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• Sach-SW: Computer-aided diagnosis
• Sach-SW: Lung cancer
• Sach-SW: Screening
• K10plus-PPN: 1776305434

Abstract

Objectives - To evaluate the influence of exposure parameters and raw-data based iterative reconstruction (IR) on the measurement variability of computer-aided nodule volumetry on chest multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). - Materials and methods - N=7 porcine lung explants were inflated in a dedicated ex vivo phantom and prepared with n=162 artificial nodules. MDCT was performed eight consecutive times (combinations of 120 and 80kV with 120, 60, 30 and 12mAs), and reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and IR. Nodule volume and diameter were measured semi-automatically with dedicated software. The absolute percentage measurement error (APE) was computed in relation to the 120kV 120mAs acquisition. Noise was recorded for each nodule in every dataset. - Results - Mean nodule volume and diameter were 0.32±0.15ml and 12.0±2.6mm, respectively. Although IR reduced noise by 24.9% on average compared to FBP (p<0.007), APE with IR was equal to or slightly higher than with FBP. Mean APE for volume increased significantly below a volume computed tomography dose index (CTDI) of 1.0mGy: for 120kV 12mAs APE was 3.8±6.2% (FBP) vs. 4.0±5.2% (IR) (p<0.007); for 80kV 12mAs APE was 8.0±13.0% vs. 9.3±15.8% (n.s.), respectively. Correlating APE with image noise revealed that at identical noise APE was higher with IR than with FBP (p<0.05). - Conclusions - Computer-aided volumetry is robust in a wide range of exposure settings, and reproducibility is reduced at a CTDI below 1.0mGy only, but the error rate remains clinically irrelevant. Noise reduction by IR is not detrimental for measurement error in the setting of semi-automatic nodule volumetry on chest MDCT.