Progression in smoldering myeloma is independently determined by the chromosomal abnormalities del(17p), t(4;14), gain 1q, hyperdiploidy, and tumor load

• Verfasst von: Neben, Kai [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Jauch, Anna [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Hielscher, Thomas [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Hillengaß, Jens [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Giesen, Nicola [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Seckinger, Anja [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Granzow, Martin [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Raab, Marc-Steffen [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Ho, Anthony Dick [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Goldschmidt, Hartmut [VerfasserIn]
• Verfasst von: Hose, Dirk [VerfasserIn]
• Titel: Progression in smoldering myeloma is independently determined by the chromosomal abnormalities del(17p), t(4;14), gain 1q, hyperdiploidy, and tumor load
• Verf.angabe: Kai Neben, Anna Jauch, Thomas Hielscher, Jens Hillengass, Nicola Lehners, Anja Seckinger, Martin Granzow, Marc S. Raab, Anthony D. Ho, Hartmut Goldschmidt, and Dirk Hose
• E-Jahr: 2013
• Jahr: October 21, 2013
• Umfang: 9 S.
• Fussnoten: Gesehen am 08.12.2021
• Titel Quelle: Enthalten in: Journal of clinical oncology
• Ort Quelle: Alexandria, Va. : American Society of Clinical Oncology, 1983
• Jahr Quelle: 2013
• Band/Heft Quelle: 31(2013), 34, Seite 4325-4332
• ISSN Quelle: 1527-7755
• DOI: doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.48.4923
• Datenträger: Online-Ressource
• Sprache: eng
• K10plus-PPN: 1780185057

Abstract

Purpose - - The aim of this study was to analyze chromosomal aberrations in terms of frequency and impact on time to progression in patients with smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) on the background of clinical prognostic factors. - - Patients and Methods - - The chromosomal abnormalities 1q21, 5p15/5q35, 9q34, 13q14.3, 15q22, 17p13, t(11;14)(q13;q32), and t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) were assessed in CD138-purified myeloma cells by interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (iFISH) alongside clinical parameters in a consecutive series of 248 patients with SMM. - - Results - - The high-risk aberrations in active myeloma (ie, del(17p13), t(4;14), and +1q21) present in 6.1%, 8.9%, and 29.8% of patients significantly confer adverse prognosis in SMM with hazard ratios (HRs) of 2.90 (95% CI, 1.56 to 5.40), 2.28 (95% CI, 1.33 to 3.91), and 1.66 (95% CI, 1.08 to 2.54), respectively. Contrary to the conditions in active myeloma, hyperdiploidy, present in 43.3% of patients, is an adverse prognostic factor (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.54). Percentage of malignant bone marrow plasma cells assessed by iFISH and combination of M-protein and plasma cell infiltration as surrogates of tumor load significantly confer adverse prognosis with HRs of 4.37 (95% CI, 2.79 to 6.85) and 4.27 (95% CI, 2.77 to 6.56), respectively. In multivariate analysis, high-risk aberrations, hyperdiploidy, and surrogates of tumor load are independently prognostic. - - Conclusion - - The high-risk chromosomal aberrations del(17p13), t(4;14), and +1q21 are adverse prognostic factors in SMM just as they are in active myeloma, independent of tumor mass. Hyperdiploidy is the first example for an adverse prognostic factor in SMM of opposite predictiveness in active myeloma. Risk association of chromosomal aberrations is not only a priori treatment dependent (predictive) but is also an intrinsic property of myeloma cells (prognostic).