Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Majlesara, Ali [VerfasserIn]   i
 Aminizadeh, Ehsan [VerfasserIn]   i
 Ramouz, Ali [VerfasserIn]   i
 Khajeh, Elias [VerfasserIn]   i
 Shahrbaf, Mohammadamin [VerfasserIn]   i
 Borges, Filipe [VerfasserIn]   i
 Goncalves, Gil [VerfasserIn]   i
 Carvalho, Carlos [VerfasserIn]   i
 Golriz, Mohammad [VerfasserIn]   i
 Mehrabi, Arianeb [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Evaluation of quality and quantity of randomized controlled trials in hepatobiliary surgery
Titelzusatz:a scoping/mapping review
Verf.angabe:Ali Majlesara, Ehsan Aminizadeh, Ali Ramouz, Elias Khajeh, Mohammadamin Shahrbaf, Filipe Borges, Gil Goncalves, Carlos Carvalho, Mohammad Golriz, Arianeb Mehrabi
Ausgabe:Online version of record before inclusion in an issue
Jahr:2024
Umfang:12 S.
Illustrationen:Diagramme
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 08.07.2024 ; Publikationsdatum: 16. April 2024 (Online)
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: European journal of clinical investigation
Ort Quelle:Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1970
Jahr Quelle:2024
Band/Heft Quelle:(2024), online version of record before inclusion in an issue, Seite 1-12
ISSN Quelle:1365-2362
Abstract:Aim To evaluate the quantity and quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in hepatobiliary surgery and for identifying gaps in current evidences. Methods A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) for RCTs of hepatobiliary surgery published from inception until the end of 2023. The quality of each study was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool. The associations between risk of bias and the region and publication date were also assessed. Evidence mapping was performed to identify research gaps in the field. Results The study included 1187 records. The number and proportion of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in hepatobiliary surgery increased over time, from 13 RCTs (.0005% of publications) in 1970-1979 to 201 RCTs (.003% of publications) in 2020-2023. There was a significant increase in the number of studies with a low risk of bias in RoB domains (p < .01). The proportion of RCTs with low risk of bias improved significantly after the introduction of CONSORT guidelines (p < .001). The evidence mapping revealed a significant research focus on major and minor hepatectomy and cholecystectomy. However, gaps were identified in liver cyst surgery and hepatobiliary vascular surgery. Additionally, there are gaps in the field of perioperative management and nutrition intervention. Conclusion The quantity and quality of RCTs in hepatobiliary surgery have increased over time, but there is still room for improvement. We have identified gaps in current research that can be addressed in future studies.
DOI:doi:10.1111/eci.14210
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

kostenfrei: Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14210
 kostenfrei: Volltext: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/eci.14210
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14210
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:evidence map
 hepatobiliary surgery
 quality assessment
 randomized controlled trial
 risk of bias
K10plus-PPN:1894423569
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/69231471   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang