| Abstract: | Foreword --Introduction --Document Disclosure, Evidentiary Value of Documents and Burden of Evidence --Privilege-Related Issues in International Arbitration --State Courts and Document Production --National Broadcasting Company, Inc. and NBC Europe, Inc. v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.; Merrill Lynch & Company; Salomon Brothers, Inc.; SBC Warburg, Inc.; Violy Byorum & Partners; and TV Azteca S.A. de C.V. (165 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 1999)), United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, Docket No. 98-7468, 26 January 1999 --Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (542 U.S. 241 (2004)), United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Docket No. 02–572, 21 June 2004 --Roz Trading, Ltd. v. Coca-Cola Company (469 F.Supp. 2d 1221 (N.D. Ga. 2006)), United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Case No. 1:06-cv-02305-WSD, 19 December 2006 --Babcock Borsig AG v. Babcock Power Inc. and Babcock-Hitachi K.K. (2008 wL 4748208 (D.Mass. 2008)), United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, Case No. 08-mc-10128-DPW, 30 October 2008 --Life Receivables Trust and Life Settlements Corporation, Doing Business as Peachtree Life Settlements v. Syndicate 102 at Lloyd’s of London (549 F.3d 210 (2d Cir. 2008)), United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, Docket No. 07-1197-cv, 25 November 2008 --Production of Documents and Fraud in International Arbitration --Adverse Inferences in International Arbitration --X. SA v. Y. Inc., Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, 1st Civil Law Chamber, Case No. 4A_450/2007, 9 January 2008 --X v. Y, ICC Award No. 8694, 1996 --United Mexican States v. Marvin Roy Feldman Karpa and The Attorney General of Canada, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Docket No. 03-CV-23500, 3 December 2003 --United Mexican States v. Marvin Roy Feldman Karpa and The Attorney General of Canada, Court of Appeal of Ontario, Docket No. C41169, 11 January 2005 --Dongwoo Mann and Hummel Co Ltd v. Mann and Hummel GmbH ([2008] SGHC 67), Supreme Court of Singapore, High Court, Suit No. OS 713/2007, 8 May 2008 --Mr. R. K. Bhandari v. Shri Satish Jassal, High Court of Delhi, Case No. 257/2007, 3 August 2007 --Are the IBA Rules “Perfectible”? --US-Style Discovery: Good or Evil ? --ICDR Guidelines for Arbitrators Concerning Exchanges of Information 2008 --Massive Productions of Documents and Demonstrative Exhibits --The Paper Tsunami in International Arbitration: Problems, Risks for the Arbitrators’ Decision Making and Possible Solutions --Will Electronic Evidence and e-discovery Change The Face of Arbitration ? --Electronic Disclosure in International Arbitration: The CIArb. Protocol for e-disclosure in Arbitration --The ICC Task Force on the Production of Electronic Documents in Arbitration–An Overview --Options for Approaching Evidentiary Privilege in International Arbitration --Concluding Remarks. |
|---|
Online-Ressource
Zum Volltext
Andere Auflagen/Ausgaben