| Online-Ressource |
Verfasst von: | Schwindling, Franz Sebastian [VerfasserIn]  |
| Dittmann, Britta [VerfasserIn]  |
| Rammelsberg, Peter [VerfasserIn]  |
Titel: | Double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses |
Titelzusatz: | a retrospective study of survival and complications |
Verf.angabe: | Franz Sebastian Schwindling, DDS, DrMedDent, Britta Dittmann, DDS, DrMedDent, and Peter Rammelsberg, DDS, DrMedDent, PhD (Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany) |
E-Jahr: | 2014 |
Jahr: | September 2014 |
Umfang: | 6 S. |
Illustrationen: | Diagramme |
Fussnoten: | Gesehen am 10.09.2020 |
Titel Quelle: | Enthalten in: The journal of prosthetic dentistry |
Ort Quelle: | London [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1951 |
Jahr Quelle: | 2014 |
Band/Heft Quelle: | 112(2014), 3, Seite 488-493 |
ISSN Quelle: | 1097-6841 |
Abstract: | STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Research data are scarce on double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses. In double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses, crown-like copings are definitively cemented to the abutment teeth and serve as prosthesis attachments. - PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival of double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses in use for 7 years and to determine their most common complications. - MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted to investigate the clinical outcome of 117 prostheses in 86 patients with 385 abutment teeth. Thirty-two telescopic-crown-retained removable dental prostheses, 51 conical-crown-retained removable dental prostheses, and 34 resilient telescopic-crown-retained overdentures were clinically reexamined by 1 investigator. Prosthesis success was defined as survival without severe complications (abutment tooth extraction). Statistical analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier modeling and Cox regression (α=.05). - RESULTS: Minor complications, for example, the decementation of primary crowns (34.2%), failure of the veneer of secondary crowns (11.1%), fracture of the denture base (17.1%), and the need for relining (12%), were common. Cumulative prosthesis survival for all types of prostheses was 93.8% after 7 years. After the same period, prosthesis success was 90% for telescopic-crown-retained removable dental prostheses and 78.5% for conical-crown-retained removable dental prostheses and resilient telescopic-crown-retained overdentures. - CONCLUSIONS: The medium-term double-crown-retained removable dental prosthesis survival found in this retrospective investigation appears acceptable. When bearing in mind the limits of this study, this kind of prosthesis might be a viable treatment option for patients with a reduced dentition. However, more laboratory and clinical research is necessary to reduce the incidence of minor complications and confirm the present in vivo results in larger patient groups. |
DOI: | doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.017 |
URL: | Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.
Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.017 |
| DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.017 |
Datenträger: | Online-Ressource |
Sprache: | eng |
Sach-SW: | Aged |
| Aged, 80 and over |
| Cementation |
| Crowns |
| Dental Abutments |
| Dental Prosthesis Design |
| Dental Restoration Failure |
| Dental Veneers |
| Denture Bases |
| Denture Rebasing |
| Denture Retention |
| Denture, Complete |
| Denture, Overlay |
| Denture, Partial, Removable |
| Female |
| Follow-Up Studies |
| Humans |
| Male |
| Middle Aged |
| Retrospective Studies |
| Survival Analysis |
| Treatment Outcome |
K10plus-PPN: | 1729825133 |
Verknüpfungen: | → Zeitschrift |
Double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses / Schwindling, Franz Sebastian [VerfasserIn]; September 2014 (Online-Ressource)