Navigation überspringen
Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Status: Bibliographieeintrag

Verfügbarkeit
Standort: ---
Exemplare: ---
heiBIB
 Online-Ressource
Verfasst von:Schwindling, Franz Sebastian [VerfasserIn]   i
 Dittmann, Britta [VerfasserIn]   i
 Rammelsberg, Peter [VerfasserIn]   i
Titel:Double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses
Titelzusatz:a retrospective study of survival and complications
Verf.angabe:Franz Sebastian Schwindling, DDS, DrMedDent, Britta Dittmann, DDS, DrMedDent, and Peter Rammelsberg, DDS, DrMedDent, PhD (Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany)
E-Jahr:2014
Jahr:September 2014
Umfang:6 S.
Illustrationen:Diagramme
Fussnoten:Gesehen am 10.09.2020
Titel Quelle:Enthalten in: The journal of prosthetic dentistry
Ort Quelle:London [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1951
Jahr Quelle:2014
Band/Heft Quelle:112(2014), 3, Seite 488-493
ISSN Quelle:1097-6841
Abstract:STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Research data are scarce on double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses. In double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses, crown-like copings are definitively cemented to the abutment teeth and serve as prosthesis attachments. - PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival of double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses in use for 7 years and to determine their most common complications. - MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted to investigate the clinical outcome of 117 prostheses in 86 patients with 385 abutment teeth. Thirty-two telescopic-crown-retained removable dental prostheses, 51 conical-crown-retained removable dental prostheses, and 34 resilient telescopic-crown-retained overdentures were clinically reexamined by 1 investigator. Prosthesis success was defined as survival without severe complications (abutment tooth extraction). Statistical analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier modeling and Cox regression (α=.05). - RESULTS: Minor complications, for example, the decementation of primary crowns (34.2%), failure of the veneer of secondary crowns (11.1%), fracture of the denture base (17.1%), and the need for relining (12%), were common. Cumulative prosthesis survival for all types of prostheses was 93.8% after 7 years. After the same period, prosthesis success was 90% for telescopic-crown-retained removable dental prostheses and 78.5% for conical-crown-retained removable dental prostheses and resilient telescopic-crown-retained overdentures. - CONCLUSIONS: The medium-term double-crown-retained removable dental prosthesis survival found in this retrospective investigation appears acceptable. When bearing in mind the limits of this study, this kind of prosthesis might be a viable treatment option for patients with a reduced dentition. However, more laboratory and clinical research is necessary to reduce the incidence of minor complications and confirm the present in vivo results in larger patient groups.
DOI:doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.017
URL:Bitte beachten Sie: Dies ist ein Bibliographieeintrag. Ein Volltextzugriff für Mitglieder der Universität besteht hier nur, falls für die entsprechende Zeitschrift/den entsprechenden Sammelband ein Abonnement besteht oder es sich um einen OpenAccess-Titel handelt.

Volltext: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.017
 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.017
Datenträger:Online-Ressource
Sprache:eng
Sach-SW:Aged
 Aged, 80 and over
 Cementation
 Crowns
 Dental Abutments
 Dental Prosthesis Design
 Dental Restoration Failure
 Dental Veneers
 Denture Bases
 Denture Rebasing
 Denture Retention
 Denture, Complete
 Denture, Overlay
 Denture, Partial, Removable
 Female
 Follow-Up Studies
 Humans
 Male
 Middle Aged
 Retrospective Studies
 Survival Analysis
 Treatment Outcome
K10plus-PPN:1729825133
Verknüpfungen:→ Zeitschrift

Permanenter Link auf diesen Titel (bookmarkfähig):  https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/68636263   QR-Code
zum Seitenanfang